Comments on: Stax Omega2 vs Stax Omega2 https://www.headfonia.com/stax-omega2-vs-stax-omega2/ Quality audio reviews Wed, 16 Oct 2019 08:06:31 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.1 By: Ahok https://www.headfonia.com/stax-omega2-vs-stax-omega2/#comment-5016 Sat, 25 Dec 2010 04:31:26 +0000 https://www.headfonia.com/?p=8043#comment-5016 In reply to Mike.

lol
of course the o2 is league better than the M50

never heard it tho,
🙁

]]>
By: Mike https://www.headfonia.com/stax-omega2-vs-stax-omega2/#comment-5013 Sat, 25 Dec 2010 03:24:40 +0000 https://www.headfonia.com/?p=8043#comment-5013 In reply to budi.

Don't think the owner would want me tampering with his $2K+ headphone 😀

]]>
By: budi https://www.headfonia.com/stax-omega2-vs-stax-omega2/#comment-4996 Fri, 24 Dec 2010 12:15:34 +0000 https://www.headfonia.com/?p=8043#comment-4996 you can fix the mid bass hump by removing the spring coil inside the driver. essentially making the driver closer to ear….there's a step by step way to do it if you have patience to search it @headfi

]]>
By: Mike https://www.headfonia.com/stax-omega2-vs-stax-omega2/#comment-4970 Thu, 23 Dec 2010 18:43:03 +0000 https://www.headfonia.com/?p=8043#comment-4970 In reply to jendol.

Lol.. no I'm not getting a BHSE. I have an older BH which is undergoing some repairs at the moment. 😀 The BHSE is a newer version of the Blue Hawaii amp. 🙂

]]>
By: Mike https://www.headfonia.com/stax-omega2-vs-stax-omega2/#comment-4969 Thu, 23 Dec 2010 18:41:58 +0000 https://www.headfonia.com/?p=8043#comment-4969 In reply to anaxilus.

Not unnaturally smooth, just grain-free. It's very clean sounding. It's good, actually. It's just that often it becomes too-clean.

The SE530 is one of the most musical sounding IEM, IMHO. I like it better than the JHs sometimes.
🙂

]]>
By: anaxilus https://www.headfonia.com/stax-omega2-vs-stax-omega2/#comment-4967 Thu, 23 Dec 2010 18:32:54 +0000 https://www.headfonia.com/?p=8043#comment-4967 So it's unnaturally smooth. Reminds me of the Shure 530 then. Overprocessed and sterile.

]]>
By: jendol https://www.headfonia.com/stax-omega2-vs-stax-omega2/#comment-4965 Thu, 23 Dec 2010 17:54:39 +0000 https://www.headfonia.com/?p=8043#comment-4965 I wonder how will these two synergize with BHSE (yours is coming I guess, right mike?)

]]>
By: Mike https://www.headfonia.com/stax-omega2-vs-stax-omega2/#comment-4960 Thu, 23 Dec 2010 16:16:33 +0000 https://www.headfonia.com/?p=8043#comment-4960 In reply to Ahok.

How dare you compare the O2 to the M50! o.0B)

]]>
By: Mike https://www.headfonia.com/stax-omega2-vs-stax-omega2/#comment-4959 Thu, 23 Dec 2010 16:16:07 +0000 https://www.headfonia.com/?p=8043#comment-4959 In reply to davy.

You'll be surprised, Dave.. 🙂

]]>
By: Mike https://www.headfonia.com/stax-omega2-vs-stax-omega2/#comment-4958 Thu, 23 Dec 2010 16:15:47 +0000 https://www.headfonia.com/?p=8043#comment-4958 In reply to Questa.

Hi, please read the other Stax review, where I talk about it in more detail: http://www.headfonia.com/stax-omega2-mk2-review/

🙂

]]>
By: Ahok https://www.headfonia.com/stax-omega2-vs-stax-omega2/#comment-4953 Thu, 23 Dec 2010 15:27:00 +0000 https://www.headfonia.com/?p=8043#comment-4953 great great reviews as always mike..
im desperate to try one of these headphones.

and solve the mystery is it better than the M50?

>:D

]]>
By: davy https://www.headfonia.com/stax-omega2-vs-stax-omega2/#comment-4952 Thu, 23 Dec 2010 14:37:34 +0000 https://www.headfonia.com/?p=8043#comment-4952 I would love audition any pair of Stax someday. Hopefully I can get to a meet that has some…someday. 🙂

]]>
By: Brian https://www.headfonia.com/stax-omega2-vs-stax-omega2/#comment-4951 Thu, 23 Dec 2010 13:48:07 +0000 https://www.headfonia.com/?p=8043#comment-4951 In reply to Mike.

Of course I’ve heard and compared them otherwise I won’t be saying what I was saying. :p

]]>
By: Questa https://www.headfonia.com/stax-omega2-vs-stax-omega2/#comment-4950 Thu, 23 Dec 2010 13:45:34 +0000 https://www.headfonia.com/?p=8043#comment-4950 Mike, would you please explain a bit more with what you mean by “all around the place” imaging?

]]>
By: Abraham https://www.headfonia.com/stax-omega2-vs-stax-omega2/#comment-4943 Thu, 23 Dec 2010 11:21:37 +0000 https://www.headfonia.com/?p=8043#comment-4943 Hey nice review mike! It's always nice to read review of good headphones 🙂

]]>
By: Abraham https://www.headfonia.com/stax-omega2-vs-stax-omega2/#comment-4942 Thu, 23 Dec 2010 11:21:37 +0000 https://www.headfonia.com/?p=8043#comment-4942 Hey nice review mike! It's always nice to read review of good headphones 🙂

]]>
By: Brian https://www.headfonia.com/stax-omega2-vs-stax-omega2/#comment-4936 Thu, 23 Dec 2010 10:41:05 +0000 https://www.headfonia.com/?p=8043#comment-4936 The claim that you have to get the MK1 in order to experience the full capability of the Omega line is largely exaggerated I’d agree. They are almost complementary in nature and I would be happy to settle with either.

But I do wonder how the C32 compares to these old veterans. Will it be the final Stax to rule them all over those silly dynamics and orthos? >:D

]]>
By: Mike https://www.headfonia.com/stax-omega2-vs-stax-omega2/#comment-4937 Thu, 23 Dec 2010 10:13:02 +0000 https://www.headfonia.com/?p=8043#comment-4937 In reply to Brian.

Things like this, sometimes you just have to hear them for yourself.

]]>