If Google is showing you this page directly, click here to go to the start of the article.
Technical Performance
The P2 Pro offers a well-balanced sound for those who prefer a flat yet musical presentation. The transition from bass to treble is smooth, with clear mids, crisp treble, and well-controlled bass. However, in terms of coherency, the P2 Pro doesn’t quite excel. The midrange is full-bodied, smooth, and somewhat veiled, while the bass is flat and the lower treble is crisp. This can create an inconsistent signature that may leave you feeling a bit conflicted at times.
Despite these shortcomings, the P2 Pro retrieves details impressively well. With a good desktop setup, every nuance in the music can be heard clearly. Although the soundstage could be more expansive, given the price, it’s hard to ask for much more.
Comparisons
The Sennheiser HD560 S offers fantastic value for its price, with both headphones providing excellent comfort. The Sennheiser is slightly lighter, making it more suitable for extended listening sessions. However, the P2 Pro stands out with its superior build quality, thanks to the use of wood and aluminum components.
The HD560 S has a lean and neutral bass, offering even less quantity than the P2 Pro. The 560 S is an analytical headphone, characterized by a flatter and drier sound signature. In contrast, the P2 Pro delivers more kick, pace, and decay in its bass. However, in the mid-range, the Sennheiser excels with its cleanliness and transparency, though the P2 Pro adds a slight musical touch that can make it more satisfying in this area. When it comes to treble, the HD560 S feels airier and more spacious. If you can overlook the 100% plastic build of the Sennheiser, it offers a lot of value at a lower cost.
Simply put, the SV023 is the better Sivga headphone. For no-sound topics, they share identical headband designs and build materials. They’re both very comfortable but the SV023 is even more thanks to the dynamic driver being lighter than the planar. The packaging is also identical.
The SV023 truly exemplifies clarity, resolution, balance, and technicality in a way that is comparable to the P2 Pro. The difference lies in the sound stage, where the SV023 performs better in my opinion. Thanks to that, it feels more spacious and has a more relaxed tuning with a holographic stage. The SV023 is also better in terms of transparency and spaciousness. The P2 Pro struggles in that department from time to time, particularly if you listen to complex recordings.
With a similar price tag, the FT5 is FiiO’s answer to this budget-fi planar market. As with the P2 Pro, the FT5 is constructed with high-quality materials. Its design, however, is much more industrial. The P2 Pro looks more authentic and to be honest much more impressive and appealing.
In sound, the FT5 has more bass, but to me, the P2 Pro has faster decay and better control. In the mid-range, the FT5 suffers from a similar problem. The clarity and transparency aren’t the best with the FT5, just like the P2 Pro. However, the FT5 also has more mid-bass, which makes things a bit more difficult, whereas the P2 Pro has a flatter bass which makes things easier for the mid-range.
The FT5 has relaxed mids and performs well enough, but it lacks some brightness and crispness. The P2 Pro delivers more detail in my opinion, and has better articulation, though they both suffer from upper treble extension.
Conclusion
I’m thoroughly impressed with the quality and authenticity of the new Sivga P2 Pro. The model features a sleek and premium design, and it remains very comfortable for extended listening sessions. The sound quality is notable for its naturalness and musicality, with moderate bass and good mid-range definition. While the technical performance is strong, there is still room for improvement. The P2 Pro is budget-friendly, making it an excellent option for those seeking high-quality planar headphones without breaking the bank.
Sivga has effectively addressed the market’s demands for design, build quality, and sound performance. Their rapid advancements, including the recent SV023, highlight their growing expertise. I am confident that they will continue to make strides with their planar-magnetic models, and I look forward to seeing their future innovations.
Summary
Pros:
Great build quality and premium materials
Good packaging and carrying case
Excellent comfort
Natural and balanced sound
Good technicalities
Cons:
The sound-stage and spaciousness can be improved
Mid-range lacks some transparency
The treble needs more extension
Bass lovers might not be satisfied
Complex recordings proved to be difficult
Page 1: Info, Package, Design, Build, Comfort
Page 2: Sound Quality
